Abstract
The destructive effects of ultrasound on cell suspensions depend on the parameters of the ultrasonic field and the experimental conditions. Erythrocytes of three origins were investigated: frog, chicken and rat. The frequency of the ultrasound was 1 MHz, with the intensity ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 Wcm^{-2}. The volume concentrations of the samples were in the range 0.5-2 per cent. The investigation determined the volume concentration limit at which, at a sufficiently high field intensity, the destructive effect may be produced. In well defined conditions (at sufficiently low concentration) cavitation occurs, which has destructive effects (haemolysis). Haemolysis is produced at a well defined concentration in each case, depending on the physical, chemical and biological properties of the erythrocytes. The threshold concentration varies for different erythrocytes; thus the following values were obtained at 0.4 Wcm^{-2}: chicken 0.5 per cent, frog 1 per cent, rat 2 per cent. At low intensities (J = 0.4 Wcm^{-2}), high frequency, short duration and diluted suspensions, cavitation plays a mayor role in the haemolysing action.References
[1] R. P. CLARKE, C. R. HILL, Physical and chemical aspects of ultrasonic disruption of cells, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 47, 2, 649-653 (1970).
[2] A. CSEKO, E. VERESS, Comparison of ultrasonic intensity measurements in different experimental conditions, Proc. 7 Int. Congr. on Acoust. Budapest, 18-26 August 1974, 561-564.
[3] R. ESCHE, Unierzuchungen zur Ultraschallabsorbtion in tiereschen Geweben and Kuntstoffen, Akust. Beih, 2, 71-74 (1952).
[4] D. E. HUGHER, W. L. NYBORG, Cell disruption by ultrasound, Science, 12, 138, 35-37, 108-114 (1962).
[2] A. CSEKO, E. VERESS, Comparison of ultrasonic intensity measurements in different experimental conditions, Proc. 7 Int. Congr. on Acoust. Budapest, 18-26 August 1974, 561-564.
[3] R. ESCHE, Unierzuchungen zur Ultraschallabsorbtion in tiereschen Geweben and Kuntstoffen, Akust. Beih, 2, 71-74 (1952).
[4] D. E. HUGHER, W. L. NYBORG, Cell disruption by ultrasound, Science, 12, 138, 35-37, 108-114 (1962).