Issues in the Design and Validation of Coupled Reverberation Rooms for Testing Acoustic Insulation of Building Partitions

Downloads

Authors

  • Agata SZELĄG Tadeusz Kościuszko Cracow University of Technology, Poland
  • Marcin ZASTAWNIK Jan Długosz University in Czestochowa, Poland

Abstract

The paper presents the characteristics of the sound field in two pairs of coupled reverberation rooms, designed in accordance with International Organization for Standardization [ISO] (2021c). The analyses are based on the results of the following studies. Firstly, the acoustic airborne sound insulation of selected test samples was measured in the reverberation rooms without using any sound diffusing nor sound absorbing elements. In the second step, the tests were repeated successively with an increasing number of diffusers installed in the rooms. The last stage of the research involved measurements with additional absorbers mounted in the rooms. The results show that although the geometry and construction of the reverberation rooms are in line with the standard guidelines, in most situations it was necessary to use diffusing and absorbing elements to improve the acoustic field in the rooms. Such elements, however, are very undesirable as they significantly limit the usable space of the rooms, making it more difficult to assemble samples and distribute sources and measurement points in the measurement space. Later in the article, the authors prove that even using typically available design tools, i.e., 1st and 2nd Bonello criterions, numerical simulations with the image-source method and the finite element method, or more advanced research methods, such as measurements using scaled samples, it seems impossible to prevent at the design stage the future necessity of using additional diffusing and absorbing elements in the reverberation rooms. Only via verification by measurements performed in the completed rooms provides the assessment if such additional elements are required.

Keywords:

Reverberation chambers, Transmission loss, Acoustic field, Small scale model

References

1. Balmori J.-A., Casado-Sanz M., Machimbarrena M., Quirós-Alpera S., Mostaza R., Acuna L. (2024), The use of waste tyre rubber recycled products in lightweight timber frame systems as acoustic insulation: A comparative analysis of acoustic performance, Buildings, 14(1): 35, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010035.

2. Bonello O. (1981), A new criterion for the distribution of normal room modes, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 29(9): 597–606.
3. Bork I. (2000), A comparison of room simulation software – The 2nd round robin on room acoustical computer simulation, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 86(6): 943–956.

4. Bradley D.T., Muller-Trapet M., Adelgren J., Vorlander M. (2014), Effect of boundary diffusers in a reverberation chamber: Standardized diffuse field quantifiers, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135: 1898–1906, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4866291.

5. Chazot J.D, Robin O., Guyader J.L., Atalla N. (2016), Diffuse acoustic field produced in reverberant rooms: A boundary diffuse field index, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 102(3): 503–316, https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918968.

6. Dijckmans A., Vermeir G. (2013), Numerical investigation of the repeatability and reproducibility of laboratory sound insulation measurements, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 99(3): 421–432, https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918623.

7. Djambova S.T., Ivanova N.B., Pleshkova-Bekiarska S.G. (2022), Comparative measurements of sound insulation of materials placed in small size acoustic chamber, [in:] 2022 57th International Scientific Conference on Information, Communication and Energy Systems and Technologies (ICEST), https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEST55168.2022.9828622.

8. Fuchs H.V., Zha X., Pommerer M. (2000), Qualifying freefield and reverberation rooms for frequencies below 100 Hz, Applied Acoustics, 59(4): 302–322, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(99)00038-9.

9. International Organization for Standardization (2020a), Acoustics – Determination and application of measurement uncertainties in building acoustics. Part 1: Sound insulation (ISO Standard No. ISO 12999-1:2020), https://www.iso.org/standard/73930.html.

10. International Organization for Standardization (2020b), Acoustics – Rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements. Part 1: Airborne sound insulation (ISO Standard No. ISO 717-1:2020), https://www.iso.org/standard/77435.html.

11. International Organization for Standardization (2021a), Acoustics – Laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements. Part 2: Measurement of airborne sound insulation (ISO Standard No. ISO 10140-2:2021), https://www.iso.org/standard/79487.html.

12. International Organization for Standardization (2021b), Acoustics – Laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements. Part 4: Measurement procedures and requirements (ISO Standard No. ISO 10140-4:2021), https://www.iso.org/standard/73911.html.

13. International Organization for Standardization (2021c), Acoustics – Laboratory measurement of sound insulation of building elements. Part 5: Requirements for test facilities and equipment (ISO Standard No. ISO 10140-5:2021), https://www.iso.org/standard/79482.html.

14. Kuttruff H. (2000), Room Acoustics, 4th ed., Spon Press, London.

15. Mleczko D., Wszołek T. (2019), Effect of diffusing elements in a reverberation room on the results of airborne sound insulation laboratory measurements, Archives of Acoustics, 44(4): 739–746, https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2019.129729.

16. Morse P.M., Bolt R.H. (1944), Sound waves in rooms, Reviews of Modern Physics, 16(2): 69–150, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.16.69.

17. Nutter D.B., Leishman T.W., Sommerfeldt S.D., Blotter J.D. (2007), Measurement of sound power and absorption in reverberation chambers using energy density, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121: 2700–2710, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2713667.

18. Oliazadeh P., Farshidianfar A., Crocker M.J. (2022), Experimental study and analytical modeling of sound transmission through honeycomb sandwich panels using SEA method, Composite Structures, 280: 114927, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114927.

19. Schmal J., Herrin D., Shaw J., Moritz Ch., Talbot A., Ghaisas N. (2021), Using simulation to predict reverberation room performance: Validation and parameter study, [in:] INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, pp. 4903–4912, https://doi.org/10.3397/IN-2021-2879.

20. Sonin A.A. (2001), The Physical Basis of Dimensional Analysis, 2nd ed., Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Cambridge.

21. Szeląg A., Baruch-Mazur K., Brawata K., Przysucha B., Mleczko D. (2021), Validation of a 1:8 scale measurement stand for testing airborne sound insulation, Sensors, 21(19): 6663, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196663.

22. Uris A., Bravo J.M., Llinares J., Estelles H. (2007), Influence of plastic electrical outlet boxes on sound insulation of gypsum board walls, Building and Environment, 42(2): 722–729, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.025.

23. Vallis J., Hayne M., Mee D., Devereux R., Steel A. (2015), Improving sound diffusion in a reverberation chamber, [in:] Proceedings of Acoustics 2015.

24. Wittstock V. (2015), Determination of measurement uncertainties in building acoustics by interlaboratory tests. Part 1: Airborne sound insulation, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 101: 88–98, http://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918807.

25. Yao D., Zhang J., Wang R., Xiao X. (2020), Effects of mounting positions and boundary conditions on the sound transmission loss of panels in a niche, Journal of Zhejiang University – SCIENCE A, 21: 129–146, https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900494.

26. Zhu Q. (2022), A case study on the transmission loss suite in the University of Technology Sydney, [in:] Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Australian Acoustical Society, Acoustics 2021.

Most read articles by the same author(s)